Editorial

Editor in chief

Bruno Caruso
University of Catania

Editorial board

Anna Alaimo
University of Catania

Edoardo Ales
University of Cassino

Marzia Barbera
University of Brescia

Bruno Caruso
University of Catania

Filip Dorssemont
University of Louvain "La Neuve"

Maximilian Fuchs
University of Ingolstadt

Stefano Giubboni
University of Perugia

Nicola Kountouris
University College London

Antonio Lo Faro
University of Catania

Julia López
University Pompeu Fabra of Barcelona

Jonas Malmberg
University of Uppsala

Giancarlo Ricci
University of Catania

Silvana Sciarra
University of Firenze

13/12/2012
l bilanciamento tra le libertà economiche e i diritti sociali collettivi operato dalla Corte di Giustizia è un contemperamento tra diritti equiordinati?*

WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 98/2012

This essay has been anonymously peer-reviewed by a referee selected by the editors. Submitted: 2012-11-6; Accepted: 2012-12-05; Published: 2012-12-13.

In the Viking and Laval judgments and more recently in the Comm. v. Germany ruling, the Court of Justice applied the proportionality test to collective rights, setting a series of restrictions to the exercise of the right to strike and the right to collective bargaining. The way the ECJ balances the economic freedoms and the social rights is indeed very different from that of the Italian Constitutional Court. Unlike the European Union Treaties, the Italian Constitution recognizes an important role to the right to take collective action which has to be connected with article 3, paragraph 2, consequently the right of strike is more protected than the exercise of economic freedoms.

Attached ITA
Attachment Size
20121213-011134_desalvia_n98intpdf.pdf 208.88 KB
Authors
de Salvia, Azzurra
Keywords
working papers,collective bargaining,trade union rights,rights of the individual,workers’ representation,strike,jurisprudence