Editorial

Editor in chief

Bruno Caruso
University of Catania

Editorial board

Anna Alaimo
University of Catania

Edoardo Ales
University of Cassino

Marzia Barbera
University of Brescia

Bruno Caruso
University of Catania

Filip Dorssemont
University of Louvain "La Neuve"

Maximilian Fuchs
University of Ingolstadt

Stefano Giubboni
University of Perugia

Nicola Kountouris
University College London

Antonio Lo Faro
University of Catania

Julia López
University Pompeu Fabra of Barcelona

Jonas Malmberg
University of Uppsala

Giancarlo Ricci
University of Catania

Silvana Sciarra
University of Firenze

27/01/2015
Il regime sanzionatorio dei licenziamenti nel Jobs Act (un commento provvisorio, dallo schema al decreto)

WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.IT – 236/2015

Contributo destinato alla raccolta di Scritti in onore di Raffaele De Luca Tamajo.

The essay is entirely dedicated to the legislative decree that – in application of the parliamentary mandate n. 189/2014 – introduces the new penalty regime to apply in case of wrongful terminations of those employees (who were employed after the approval of the mentioned legislative decree) hired under the new form of permanent contract called: “contratto di lavoro subordinato a tutele crescenti”. This study is composed of three parts. The introduction contains a general analysis of the content of the new law and discusses its impact on the labor legal field. The first part highlights the potential risks related to the definition of the application field of the new penalty regime, with specific regard to the article 3 of the Constitution. On the other side, the second part of this study faces the most relevant questions of interpretation that eventually would arise on the new penalty regime; specifically, this section analyzes the new discipline of the distribution of the burden of proof in order to identify the cases of potential judicial reinstatement of the employee.

Attached ITA
Authors
Marazza, Marco
Keywords
working papers,Italy,labour market,reforms,work contract,termination of employment,interpretation,labour dispute,burden of proof,Jobs act